The
fifth chapter of Fair
Isn’t Always Equal,
by Rick Wormeli, talked a lot about the use of “tiering” in the
classroom. Simply put, tiering is the altering of expectations based
on the readiness, interest, and learning profiles of the students.
When creating tiered assessments it is important to start with the
middle level, the level that meets the standard, from there you can
create the higher or lower levels. The reason for this is that if you
start too high or too low then the expectations for the other groups
may be influenced; for example, if you create the higher level assessment first than you may be blinded to what the actual standard expects, thus
creating an unfair exam; likewise, if you start too low than the others
levels may not be challenged enough.
Tiering does intrigue me, especially for the more diverse classroom. Providing students the chance to exercise their creativity with my assignments will be more than welcome, assuming academically it does not interfere. The book introduces many ways to tier
assignments, of them the RAFTS concept is particularly interesting.
As a beach ball, I am a big fan of choices and providing options.
However, a lot of students when given too many choices say they don't
know where to begin, so this may be a structured way with which
variety can be introduced. With that said, I think tiering can be
really effective, but it is also something that teachers should
implement cautiously. I have had teachers tier work before in a
not-so-subtle manner and it led to the higher level kids feeling frustrated, and the lower level kids feeling belittled.
No comments:
Post a Comment